THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN MAAT AND ISFET (NINE)

Why Was The Ancient Kemites Vehemently Abused By The Hebrews?

The vehement abuse of our ancestors in the Hebrew narrative records and in the Old Testament of the Bible needs serious attention from the People of KEMET. The ancient Kemites were morally abused by the Hebrews in their narratives of Faith and the Hebrew records have been used ever since the emergence of the Hebrews by other religions of ISFET to create an obnoxious image of our beloved continent and its people. What did our ancestors do to the Hebrews to merit such an implacable curse on their descendants? We have been told that the motive or reason for the moral abuse was the allegation that our ancestors enslaved the Hebrews for about 400 years and that the abuse is the moral consequence for the alleged evil deed.

Let us critically investigate this matter very seriously for the sake of the Truth. There are many irreconcilable questions and issues regarding this allegation of the Hebrews. Was there any people recognized by history as the Hebrews before the creation of the myth of being enslaved by our ancestors? Were the Hebrews a people in their own land living somewhere on their own in the world before they were allegedly captured and enslaved in ancient KEMET? How did the Hebrews become formed as a people? Is there any record in ancient KEMET about the Hebrews as a people to corroborate their narratives? If the Hebrews never existed as a people before they came to ancient KEMET, why do some people take the Hebrew narratives of their enslavement seriously? Why did the Hebrews create the skin color contraption that made the black image unworthy of moral rectitude?

Are we going to accept the Hebrew record without any iota of proof? Where does the burden of proof reside? Is it with the People of KEMET that the burden of proof reside or is it with the Hebrew people and their descendants that the burden of proof reside? The descendants of the ancient Kemites have been enslaved, humiliated and abused because of the Hebrew narrative of being enslaved by the ancient Kemites. Is the Hebrew ideology of an "Eye For an Eye" justified from the point of view of the People of KEMET? Are we going to accept the continued demonstration by the world of Ekwensu that the Hebrews were morally right and that the ancient Kemites were morally wrong?

Since the Hebrews had no known history as a people before they were formed in ancient KEMET, the myth of them being enslaved in KEMET stood or fell upon the validity of history that slavery existed in ancient KEMET in the same magnitude of what the Africans suffered in the Americas. We cannot say for sure whether or not there was a people in ancient KEMET who were related to the Hebrews. But we know for sure that during the Hyksos invasion and consequent occupation of Lower KEMET, many migrants were allowed to settle mostly in the delta of the Nile (Hapy) river. The Hyksos invaders occupied Lower KEMET and through out their more than one century of their rule of Lower KEMET they were unable to gain access and control of the Upper KEMET. All their efforts to gain the secrets of the Mystery System of KEMET were in vain and they were later defeated and expelled from the land of KEMET.

This historical fact is the only historical account of ancient KEMET that had little resemblance to the Hebrew narratives of Faith. If the Hebrews came into ancient KEMET during the Hyksos occupation of Lower KEMET, it means that they were part of the foreign migrants or invaders that occupied and ruled Lower KEMET for some time. When the Hyksos were finally expelled remnants of those who had settled in ancient KEMET, mostly Lower KEMET, may have remained behind and some also may have intermarried with some of the local people at the time.

How those who remained behind after the expulsion may have been treated was not clearly documented by our ancestors. But what was certainly clear had been the fact that they were expelled and they were free to leave the land of KEMET. Indeed, whether or not the remnants who chose to remain behind in our beloved land of KEMET were later enslaved is out of character with the ancient records. Rightly or wrongly, those who remained behind may not have been treated as equal citizens of the land of KEMET; but to call whatever condition that they may have found themselves "slavery" is an overstatement and it is disagreeable to us as the People of KEMET.

These remnants who stayed behind however became the basis upon which the Hebrew ideology and identity would later be based and developed. We can now see the fundamental differences between the myth of the Hebrews and the reality of the history in ancient KEMET.

Without any doubt, the religions of ISFET imposed slavery on Africans for many centuries and the secret motive behind this imposition of slavery on Africans was a retaliation or revenge as to what the Hebrew narrative of Faith claimed that was done unto them in ancient KEMET. This "Eye for an Eye" theology or narrative of Faith is unjustifiable for the Hebrews were never enslaved by our ancestors in the same manner or magnitude that the Africans had been enslaved and murdered.

There is no iota of proof to convince us that the defeated Hyksos invaders were enslaved. Our history teaches us that when the Hyksos were defeated in Lower KEMET that they were expelled and were given free passage out of the Nile Valley. This was also what had happened to the Moors in Spain after they were defeated. The Moors were expelled after their defeat and were given free passage out of the Iberian Peninsula and most of them evacuated to West Africa and North Africa.

Therefore, if any remnant of the migrant settlers and invaders who had remained in ancient KEMET were treated badly, we cannot understand why it was so for they were given free passage to leave the land of KEMET. But to claim that they had been enslaved against their will after they had been told to evacuate freely and for them to have created the moral abuse for the singular purpose of destroying the integrity of a whole continental people is unjustifiable. Nevertheless, a lie not challenged over an extended period often becomes a historical concoction of fact and the people may perish because of the ignorance of the real facts of history as a result. Let it then be known that the People of KEMET are in total disagreement with the Hebrew narrative of having been enslaved in ancient KEMET. In other words, we the People of KEMET are convinced that the restoration of the Truth should serve as the basis for the regeneration of the African humanity.

THE CREATOR IS ONE. THE ONE IS AMUN AND THE DIVINE PLAN IS EKUMEKU. THERE IS NO OTHER CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE BUT AMUN IN WHOM WE TRUST.

Blessings of Hotep!

In the spirit of MAAT, I am

YOUR HUMBLE SERVANT.